- API & Integration
- SparkPost vs SendGrid
- Learn More
- Volume Pricing
Choose your sending volume and get up and running in minutes.
- Add-on Plans
Combine with any volume tier for a custom tailored plan.
- Get Started for Free
- Help & Docs
- Deliverability Guide
- Case Studies
- Email Explained
- White Papers & Guides
- Webinars & Videos
Message Systems joined forces with Twitter yesterday to announce the release of the Email Privacy Report, providing the public with visibility into whether their own email providers utilize verifiable security protocols to protect their users.
Our hope is that the Email Privacy Report will encourage users and ISPs to open a dialogue supporting the use of STARTTLS text encryption protocols and the establishment of industry-wide standards, with an end-goal of safer email communication, improved business productivity and protection against the theft of personally identifying information.
According to Josh Aberant, Postmaster at Twitter, “Generally there is a lack of accurate and real-time info about the privacy settings of Internet communications. The Email Privacy Report gives users and researchers an up-to-date accounting of email transit encryption as seen by Twitter’s ops.”
This collaborative effort leverages both Twitter’s position as one of the largest global social networks with a reach of hundreds of millions of people and Message Systems’ expertise in email infrastructure and delivery. The two companies worked hand in hand to expose the data, sort it, measure it, aggregate it and provide the most comprehensive Encryption of Email in Transit report currently available on the Internet.
The report will be a permanently accessible tool on the Twitter website, easily tweeted out by users with the aim of widely distributing information that concerns every citizen on the Internet. Users are also encouraged to tweet about ISPs that provide excellent security – or those that need improvement.
Click here to read the full press release.
SparkPost’s messaging policy mandates that any mail sent through our service other than transactional email or legally mandated messages must be opted in by the recipient. You may wonder why this is so. Our goal is to ensure that your emails are accepted everywhere, or as close to that as possible. When people have not opted in, they are more likely to complain, which can cause ISPs to block your email—even to engaged recipients. Demanding this of all our clients is also how we preserve the very high visibility and deliverability of email sent via SparkPost managed IPs and client domains.
The Canadian anti-spam law (CASL) sets out very clear requirements defining what it means to be “opted in” in Canada. Many senders don’t know which of their recipients are Canadian, so adhering to this high standard for everyone on the mailing list errs on the side of caution.
The increasing prevalence of these types of laws makes it imperative to collect auditable details about opt ins at the same time you collect email addresses and other information about recipients. If you’re opting people in via a form, you want to keep a copy of the form noting the URL where somebody opted in, the timestamp, and their IP address. That’s helpful when confronted by a service provider compliance team presenting complaints of abuse levied against your domain. If we can say that the person signed up on this form at this date via this IP address, problems go away fast. Many companies are not prepared and an answer of “we think their email address came from an event that we did two years ago” can cause doubt and trouble with a service provider, and that hurts your reputation as a sender and as a SparkPost user. It can also place your account in jeopardy.
Most companies are not keeping very good auditable records of opt ins, in part because they have so many avenues through which a person may opt in. The longer a company has been in business, the more chances they have had data troubles at some point. Things get messy with time, which makes it difficult to respond when problems arise. That could spell legal trouble or difficulty with service providers, but it’s almost certainly a recipe for hindering a company’s ability to successfully send email.
For more details about opt-in strategies and retaining relevant data, check out:SparkPost © 2017 All Rights Reserved